New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 700912 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

28.2% regression in v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 at 455038:455781

Project Member Reported by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=700912

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtJ7DpQsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 14 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_avg/v8-gc-incremental-finalize_avg

Revision                           Result                     N
chromium@455037                    0.760663 +- 0.0361522      6       good
chromium@455409                    0.718283 +- 0.189482       6       good
chromium@455595                    0.777372 +- 0.105095       6       good
chromium@455688                    0.759904 +- 0.180995       14      good
chromium@455712                    0.771702 +- 0.316096       21      good
chromium@455718                    0.738251 +- 0.140983       9       good
chromium@455719                    0.721868 +- 0.106777       6       good
chromium@455719,v8@fbffc377e3      0.875623 +- 0.169965       6       bad
chromium@455720                    0.843836 +- 0.0819367      6       bad
chromium@455721                    0.856996 +- 0.19316        9       bad
chromium@455724                    0.838701 +- 0.265919       21      bad
chromium@455735                    0.852913 +- 0.229835       14      bad
chromium@455781                    0.881285 +- 0.152985       6       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985229309619462592

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5849055151783936


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by mustaq@chromium.org, Jul 10 2017

Most of these bugs re v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 should be handled through  Issue 724262  .

Comment 5 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 11 2017

Owner: u...@chromium.org

Comment 6 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
The regression is not reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment