Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
40.3% regression in loading.mobile at 456254:456269 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985236793791717568
,
Mar 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.mobile Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/Regular-3G/https___en.m.wikipedia.org_wiki_Solo_Foods Revision Result N chromium@456253 4683.79 +- 1369.31 21 good chromium@456269 4886.57 +- 2596.49 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...en.m.wikipedia.org.wiki.Solo.Foods loading.mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985236793791717568 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6063031294885888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 2 2017
This recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hjd@chromium.org
, Mar 13 2017