All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=700824

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtMCYtwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1LXI-AgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1L-BlwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglKvQoAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglNaxwgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1KzY6ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1Kio8QsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1Jq4oAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1NKm5QsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglJve_goM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglL2Z5AsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglKXG5QgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglILT_wkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1IG74ggM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
chromium-rel-win8-dual

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985245342821997888

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@454739      39.6374 +- 36.0367      21      good
chromium@454985      46.0051 +- 87.7391      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985245342821997888

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4870222911111168


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984888484507013872

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Michael Lippautz
  Commit : 68d6b6c613c8641748a390a10d886859e5afa38b
  Date   : Fri Mar 03 12:10:33 2017
  Subject: [heap] Support for minor MC marking during incremental marking part 2

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo
  Metric       : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur
  Change       : 12.15% | 59.0592010979 -> 66.2367457802

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@454500                    59.0592 +- 2.38698      6      good
chromium@454650                    58.1466 +- 2.45045      6      good
chromium@454725                    59.6048 +- 3.54694      6      good
chromium@454763                    59.2746 +- 1.80981      6      good
chromium@454782                    60.612 +- 5.15761       6      good
chromium@454790                    61.0522 +- 5.726        6      good
chromium@454793                    61.5419 +- 4.29971      6      good
chromium@454794                    59.2686 +- 3.33298      6      good
chromium@454794,v8@de52562d8e      59.9334 +- 2.19374      6      good
chromium@454794,v8@f7bc5ef0bc      57.2323 +- 4.15276      6      good
chromium@454794,v8@14106d2d51      57.8566 +- 2.97988      6      good
chromium@454794,v8@68d6b6c613      67.434 +- 3.30193       6      bad       <--
chromium@454794,v8@1a6487fd65      66.7959 +- 3.64769      6      bad
chromium@454795                    67.6972 +- 6.78226      6      bad
chromium@454800                    68.4396 +- 2.86546      6      bad
chromium@455100                    66.2367 +- 4.40428      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984888484507013872

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833855128305664


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378653174678864

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@454739      35.1406 +- 41.3982      21      good
chromium@454985      42.8957 +- 98.668       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378653174678864

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4870222911111168


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!