All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=700821

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1MqsjwoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtK7j_QgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglKvQoAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1ML4owkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1K7OrwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1KWC6woM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglILT_wkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglIekvAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-win7-dual
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985245587163627792

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@454739      41.1244 +- 76.4191      21      good
chromium@454985      55.8225 +- 110.978      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985245587163627792

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5875111443300352


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985237258432119328

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: d8b7d84c49f08b6e50de6da191264401c074c5a0
  bad_revision : 928e5c9893c2524717d882f92381b7a6c9518685

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@454726      137.2 +- 56.6365        21       good
chromium@454780      129.043 +- 45.9496      14       good
chromium@454808      ---                     ---      build failure
chromium@454809      144.353 +- 12.7086      6        bad
chromium@454828      144.11 +- 67.3795       21       bad
chromium@454878      150.251 +- 49.1631      14       bad
chromium@454984      149.837 +- 30.6484      14       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985237258432119328

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6347393227816960


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985144111184447232

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@454726      139.094 +- 78.1643      21      good
chromium@454984      150.262 +- 73.728       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985144111184447232

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5515737571000320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984888072531410496

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@454600      100.712 +- 21.6174      21      good
chromium@454650      100.928 +- 15.8156      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984888072531410496

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6743374096236544


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982612095580128560

All graphs recovered.