New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 700817 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Mar 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

112.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo at 456008:456125

Project Member Reported by hpayer@google.com, Mar 13 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hpayer@google.com, Mar 13 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=700817

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1JXovAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@456007      5.76286 +- 2.99069      21      good
chromium@456125      5.954 +- 2.21884        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985246167961932656

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5824785365336064


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@456007      5.77071 +- 3.57923      21      good
chromium@456125      5.95033 +- 1.46251      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985246179416972384

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5855773822812160


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by hpayer@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment