Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
13.3% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 454978:455037 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985518081625373008
,
Mar 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : API:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Revision Result N chromium@454977 276.399 +- 29.4205 21 good chromium@455037 279.366 +- 25.9358 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985518081625373008 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5346957570080768 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985161223136980672
,
Mar 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : API:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Revision Result N chromium@455007 276.809 +- 32.1954 21 good chromium@455075 278.289 +- 31.7378 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985161223136980672 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5308775981907968 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 22 2017
The ref build also increased at the same time. I suspect this is an infra problem.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620272102053424
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982615998331665632
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : API:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Revision Result N chromium@455007 280.188 +- 24.2564 21 good chromium@455075 278.649 +- 26.8365 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620272102053424 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5308775981907968 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org
, Mar 10 2017