Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.1%-14.8% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_turbo at 453924:454125 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985611618962728576
,
Mar 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : V8 C++:duration_avg/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr Revision Result N chromium@453923 222.577 +- 22.3066 21 good chromium@453979 221.891 +- 17.7471 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985611618962728576 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6333580143230976 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 22 2017
It seems, this one can be closed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org
, Mar 9 2017