Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.2%-12.3% regression in startup.warm.blank_page at 452445:452511 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985649527910829568
,
Mar 9 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author mark@chromium.org === Hi mark@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : mark Commit : d0b0e164df66904125ecdcf3473212a1d97a11ce Date : Thu Feb 23 16:11:02 2017 Subject: Update Crashpad to 4a2043ea65e2641ef1a921801c0aaa15ada02fc7 Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : startup.warm.blank_page Metric : first_non_empty_paint_time/first_non_empty_paint_time Change : 4.25% | 158.476190476 -> 165.214285714 Revision Result N chromium@452444 158.476 +- 132.64 21 good chromium@452478 150.444 +- 23.2857 9 good chromium@452495 153.714 +- 68.1679 14 good chromium@452503 150.222 +- 24.6892 9 good chromium@452507 160.0 +- 174.763 14 good chromium@452509 163.222 +- 112.461 9 good chromium@452510 175.571 +- 142.223 14 bad <-- chromium@452511 165.214 +- 18.1757 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=2 --also-run-disabled-tests startup.warm.blank_page Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985649527910829568 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5326115033317376 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 9 2017
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/d0b0e164df66904125ecdcf3473212a1d97a11ce None of the stuff in that roll range is in Chrome’s startup path.
,
Mar 9 2017
Yeah, this bisect is bad, it recovers in the very next CL. It's hard to use the ref build as that's so noisy, but it looks like the ref builds are also regressing, so sorry about the noise. Won'tfix.
,
Mar 11 2017
,
Mar 11 2017
,
Mar 11 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com
, Mar 8 2017