Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
13.7%-46.4% regression in blink_perf.parser at 454722:454932 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985654854293416864
,
Mar 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 5f0498f32748dd816a021ac5cd3c919693b679b7 bad_revision : f193ee6d21e6548ed425746ec80fb71faa7998a5 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.parser Metric : query-selector-all-id-deep/query-selector-all-id-deep Revision Result N chromium@454721 995.962 +- 19.5515 6 good chromium@454822 998.333 +- 16.9587 6 good chromium@454850 873.325 +- 13.3298 6 bad chromium@454877 853.9 +- 16.7496 6 bad chromium@454932 893.236 +- 10.4719 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985654854293416864 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833666619506688 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985593574906106048
,
Mar 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : mlippautz Commit : d8e518533a6a987997cdcf438ddc21573eb75de0 Date : Mon Mar 06 11:03:10 2017 Subject: MutationObserver: Keep related nodes and callback alive through tracing Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.parser Metric : query-selector-all-class/query-selector-all-class Change : 18.93% | 365.307928397 -> 296.160133245 Revision Result N chromium@454738 365.308 +- 9.13292 6 good chromium@454842 357.118 +- 23.792 6 good chromium@454846 343.143 +- 16.2526 6 good chromium@454847 292.961 +- 8.28984 6 bad <-- chromium@454848 290.981 +- 10.3845 6 bad chromium@454849 294.085 +- 3.45742 6 bad chromium@454855 287.762 +- 28.5036 6 bad chromium@454868 295.209 +- 3.49071 6 bad chromium@454894 293.505 +- 4.39157 6 bad chromium@454946 296.16 +- 6.1092 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985593574906106048 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5859593458024448 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com
, Mar 8 2017