New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 699717 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

21.5%-93.1% regression in v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 at 453947:454036

Project Member Reported by benhenry@google.com, Mar 8 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@453946      3.83144 +- 1.27873       21      good
chromium@454036      3.77815 +- 0.903787      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985654928616423168

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6423765329641472


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 4 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 25 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment