New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 699162 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

93.1% regression in v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 at 453947:454036

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, Mar 7 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=699162

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5JO1tQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@453946      4.05331 +- 1.5745       21      good
chromium@454036      3.84944 +- 1.58722      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985760179077073808

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4940046865530880


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 23 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@453946      3.73177 +- 1.37151      21      good
chromium@454036      3.86651 +- 1.38888      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378557854502016

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4940046865530880


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment