Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 451895:451964 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985765252397448320
,
Mar 7 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author wangxianzhu@chromium.org === Hi wangxianzhu@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : wangxianzhu Commit : 8cc1739f3017dca5bc97d2721bcdfc903eaec6ec Date : Wed Feb 22 07:11:36 2017 Subject: Reduce the requirement for saving previousLocation Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_qq Change : 2.16% | 70938624.0 -> 72470528.0 Revision Result N chromium@451894 70938624 +- 2993366 14 good chromium@451903 70954098 +- 2431698 9 good chromium@451906 71005070 +- 2624112 9 good chromium@451907 71170731 +- 2251315 6 good chromium@451908 72485092 +- 123576 9 bad <-- chromium@451912 72477810 +- 61787.9 9 bad chromium@451929 72470528 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@451964 72470528 +- 0.0 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985765252397448320 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776795615363072 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 7 2017
There seems no direct relation between the blink optimization and gpu memory. May be just accidental. WontFix because the change is trivial.
,
Mar 11 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, Mar 7 2017