Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
35.8% regression in blink_perf.layout at 453597:453631 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985772580874538016
,
Mar 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : floats_100_100/floats_100_100 Revision Result N chromium@453596 957.053 +- 0.0 1 good chromium@453631 882.414 +- 34.2452 2 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985772580874538016 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6461111278239744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, Mar 7 2017