New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 699093 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

35.8% regression in blink_perf.layout at 453597:453631

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, Mar 7 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=699093

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglLTJpgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.layout
  Metric       : floats_100_100/floats_100_100

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@453596      957.053 +- 0.0          1      good
chromium@453631      882.414 +- 34.2452      2      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985772580874538016

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6461111278239744


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment