Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
63.1% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 452432:452644 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986140392399848576
,
Mar 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to continue Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either good or bad. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-total_max/browse_media/browse_media_youtube Revision Result N chromium@452431 15.9208 +- 7.59731 21 good chromium@452538 17.325 +- 14.4185 21 unknown chromium@452644 17.722 +- 12.2613 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986140392399848576 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5233717435432960 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 28 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mlippautz@google.com
, Mar 3 2017