New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 698019 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.4% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 453031:453061

Project Member Reported by sullivan@chromium.org, Mar 2 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=698019

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgpNLgtgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus6

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@453030      47070849 +- 1026510      21      good
chromium@453061      47056318 +- 1768128      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986200909348588496

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5708968048984064


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Labels: Performance-Memory
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment