Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.6%-2.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 453481:453595 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986211323174514496
,
Mar 11 2017
,
Mar 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984382508753893168
,
Mar 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_media/load_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@453532 63267986 +- 11901340 21 good chromium@453595 62846683 +- 14187339 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984382508753893168 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4537141788409856 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984227368927644736
,
Mar 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_hackernews Revision Result N chromium@453480 2114735 +- 37752.6 21 good chromium@453554 2114735 +- 44470.0 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.hackernews system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984227368927644736 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4537141788409856 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983588911459627664
,
Mar 31 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_games/load_games_spychase Revision Result N chromium@453480 2114735 +- 37752.6 21 good chromium@453554 2114735 +- 44470.0 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.spychase system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983588911459627664 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4537141788409856 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Mar 2 2017