Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5%-3.3% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 453570:453596 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986212945454861776
,
Mar 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true Revision Result N chromium@453569 8321024 +- 816716 21 good chromium@453596 8295424 +- 826725 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986212945454861776 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6634504241807360 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 6 2017
ref build moves too.
,
Mar 11 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Mar 2 2017