Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.8%-252.5% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 453240:453501 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSplitting off from bug 697665 because there are both energy and memory regressions in one bug. Will check if bisect dupes this one.
,
Mar 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986219393204591680
,
Mar 2 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/play_media/play_media_soundcloud Revision Result N chromium@453239 343.868 +- 727.517 21 good chromium@453381 301.839 +- 513.84 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=play.media.soundcloud system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986219393204591680 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6707186899615744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986143693435881104
,
Mar 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : rogerm Commit : 2233a4a7cb12ac4acdebd33491b528f8fb670f02 Date : Mon Feb 27 23:11:16 2017 Subject: [translate] Add translate ranker model loader. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.masrawy.com_ Change : 61.72% | 1738.09566667 -> 2810.90316667 Revision Result N chromium@453311 1738.1 +- 95.7368 6 good chromium@453355 1732.82 +- 41.5287 6 good chromium@453377 1758.03 +- 50.9513 6 good chromium@453378 2811.97 +- 10.9788 6 bad <-- chromium@453379 2821.53 +- 37.4865 6 bad chromium@453380 2820.59 +- 20.031 6 bad chromium@453383 2815.77 +- 31.4448 6 bad chromium@453388 2816.02 +- 28.0411 6 bad chromium@453398 2827.09 +- 46.7154 6 bad chromium@453485 2810.9 +- 18.3474 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.masrawy.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986143693435881104 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5791020849037312 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Mar 2 2017