=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author wangxianzhu@chromium.org ===
Hi wangxianzhu@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit
Suspected Commit
Author : wangxianzhu
Commit : 9686be68e53348bab6f4ce846bf07d494f1575a0
Date : Tue Jan 24 19:34:26 2017
Subject: Enable SlimmingPaintInvalidation
Bisect Details
Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
Benchmark : smoothness.tough_scrolling_cases
Metric : mean_pixels_checkerboarded/mean_pixels_checkerboarded
Change : 3.69% | 14.2472625 -> 14.7725666667
Revision Result N
chromium@445756 14.2473 +- 0.470153 6 good
chromium@445776 14.1435 +- 0.34458 6 good
chromium@445777 14.3197 +- 0.516706 9 good
chromium@445778 14.7509 +- 0.861672 9 bad <--
chromium@445779 14.7832 +- 0.214041 6 bad
chromium@445781 14.6512 +- 0.363545 6 bad
chromium@445786 14.6996 +- 0.759984 9 bad
chromium@445796 14.6908 +- 0.67232 9 bad
chromium@445835 14.7726 +- 0.386628 6 bad
To Run This Test
src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_scrolling_cases
Debug Info
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986398123626414032
Is this bisect wrong?
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5255268172038144
| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
| X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
Summary: 5~75% regression in mean_pixels_checkerboarded on smoothness.tough_scrolling_cases on Win 10 and Mac Retina (was: ~5% regression in mean_pixels_checkerboarded on smoothness.tough_scrolling_cases on Win 10)
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit
Suspected Commit
Author : wangxianzhu
Commit : 9686be68e53348bab6f4ce846bf07d494f1575a0
Date : Tue Jan 24 19:34:26 2017
Subject: Enable SlimmingPaintInvalidation
Bisect Details
Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Benchmark : smoothness.tough_scrolling_cases
Metric : mean_pixels_checkerboarded/mean_pixels_checkerboarded
Change : 102.71% | 1.6401375 -> 3.3247
Revision Result N
chromium@445697 1.64014 +- 0.295377 6 good
chromium@445769 2.16841 +- 1.07432 9 good
chromium@445774 2.09561 +- 0.875174 6 good
chromium@445776 1.89887 +- 0.716698 6 good
chromium@445777 1.94826 +- 0.612657 5 good
chromium@445778 3.83673 +- 0.932088 6 bad <--
chromium@445787 3.15973 +- 1.1855 6 bad
chromium@445805 4.06895 +- 0.53386 6 bad
chromium@445841 3.3247 +- 1.39642 6 bad
To Run This Test
src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_scrolling_cases
Debug Info
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986305900953062112
Is this bisect wrong?
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5796504314314752
| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
| X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Feb 28 2017