All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=696875

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgxPrrtgkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986446199736455552

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986193165487547072

Started new bisect:
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986193165487547072

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986119263983863952

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : buffering_time/crowd1080_vp9.webm

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451852      2314.94 +- 3770.43      21      good
chromium@452845      1378.97 +- 2426.1       14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986119263983863952

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5865908972552192


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985815831491601600

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : buffering_time/crowd1080_vp9.webm

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451852      835.183 +- 4560.62      21      good
chromium@452845      976.417 +- 4573.32      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985815831491601600

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5772949237268480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985639082263541072

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : buffering_time/crowd1080_vp9.webm

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451852      1454.45 +- 4941.97      21      good
chromium@452845      2370.0 +- 10379.9       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985639082263541072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6359230359011328


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982604010740682224

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982576143083919248

Bisects never came back with a valid result.
The current levels seem to be back to normal, and the test videos are below the reference videos.