New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 696856 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocking:
issue 696881



Sign in to add a comment

7%-33.3% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 451671:452845 [memory]

Project Member Reported by tguilbert@chromium.org, Feb 28 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Summary: 7%-33.3% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 451671:452845 [memory] (was: 7%-33.3% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 451671:452845)
Labels: media_regression_2_27
Blocking: 696881

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : vm_proportional_set_size_delta/video.html?src_crowd1080_vp9.webm_canvas_true

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451685      77623.2 +- 15314.5      21      good
chromium@451789      79809.7 +- 18990.0      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd1080.vp9.webm.canvas.true media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986192764223792992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5895120924180480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : vm_proportional_set_size_delta/video.html?src_crowd1080_vp9.webm_canvas_true

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451685      85085.8 +- 11926.4      21      good
chromium@452886      85545.5 +- 9766.46      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd1080.vp9.webm.canvas.true media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986119573973217200

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5290337821523968


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : vm_shared_dirty_delta/tulip2.ogv_renderer


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620276819673744

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5308564421214208


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Most of the perf results are now better than the ref. The ones that aren't are varying a lot on a day to day basis

Sign in to add a comment