Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
131.2% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 452846:452919 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986517511266107440
,
Mar 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378696035163648
,
Mar 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@452845 4.61371 +- 8.95419 21 good chromium@452919 4.23238 +- 5.59505 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378696035163648 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4706655087886336 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983687484195208736
,
Mar 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@452845 8.13862 +- 12.7253 21 good chromium@452919 8.45014 +- 11.032 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983687484195208736 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4706655087886336 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983037466787073888
,
Apr 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@452845 3.87867 +- 2.45592 21 good chromium@452919 4.02538 +- 3.02637 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983037466787073888 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4706655087886336 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 26 2017
,
Jan 10
Downgrading P2s that haven't been modified in more than 6 months, which have no component or owner. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Feb 27 2017