New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 696449 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Untriaged
Owner: ----
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: 2019-07-09
OS: ----
Pri: 3
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

131.2% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 452846:452919

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Feb 27 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, Feb 27 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=696449

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgxKKW9QgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 23 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@452845      4.61371 +- 8.95419      21      good
chromium@452919      4.23238 +- 5.59505      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378696035163648

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4706655087886336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@452845      8.13862 +- 12.7253      21      good
chromium@452919      8.45014 +- 11.032       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983687484195208736

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4706655087886336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@452845      3.87867 +- 2.45592      21      good
chromium@452919      4.02538 +- 3.02637      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983037466787073888

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4706655087886336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 26 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Labels: Pri-3
NextAction: 2019-07-09
Downgrading P2s that haven't been modified in more than 6 months, which have no component or owner.

Sign in to add a comment