Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.5%-52.5% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 451896:452027 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986733814195971952
,
Feb 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : long-sibling-list/long-sibling-list To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986733814195971952 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5335567417475072 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Feb 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986718830256780320
,
Feb 25 2017
Re-running bisect. The graphs are QUITE clear there's a stair-step down.
,
Feb 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.canvas Metric : getImageData/getImageData To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986718830256780320 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6652345066192896 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Feb 25 2017
Graphs have recovered.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982619859571362400
,
Apr 11 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author nainar@chromium.org === Hi nainar@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : nainar Commit : 8b6c7b7ce5a36d8eda49dd6e60c5e7c8f5c7277f Date : Wed Feb 22 10:52:39 2017 Subject: Call Element::rebuildLayoutTree from Document::updateStyle directly Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : long-sibling-list/long-sibling-list Change : 11.58% | 168.394020354 -> 148.887688372 Revision Result N chromium@451939 168.394 +- 3.34838 6 good chromium@451983 166.452 +- 4.0719 6 good chromium@451986 165.283 +- 6.41915 6 good chromium@451987 148.238 +- 5.12309 6 bad <-- chromium@451988 149.444 +- 6.98084 6 bad chromium@451989 148.23 +- 2.78261 6 bad chromium@451994 148.322 +- 1.96924 6 bad chromium@452005 147.605 +- 1.98813 6 bad chromium@452027 148.888 +- 1.77618 5 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982619859571362400 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5335567417475072 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Feb 24 2017