Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.1% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 451238:451280 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986741967718042992
,
Feb 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.tough_video_cases Metric : gpu_average_frequency_hz/video.html?src_smpte_3840x2160_60fps_vp9.webm Revision Result N chromium@451237 474171667 +- 24829310 21 good To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.smpte.3840x2160.60fps.vp9.webm media.tough_video_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986741967718042992 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5327235180920832 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 8 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620033834055168 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hubbe@google.com
, Feb 24 2017