New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 696021 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

57.9% regression in media.tough_video_cases_extra at 451768:451852

Project Member Reported by hubbe@google.com, Feb 24 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hubbe@google.com, Feb 24 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=696021

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDghIfLoAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 25 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_extra
  Metric       : seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451767      24.0524 +- 7.83838      21      good
chromium@451852      23.8652 +- 6.38748      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986742169732044496

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5266038070968320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_extra
  Metric       : seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451767      22.8695 +- 2.99882      21      good
chromium@451852      23.3088 +- 5.30585      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632285291771344

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5266038070968320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 26 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Components: Internals>Media
Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.

Sign in to add a comment