New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 694628 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 692932
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.6% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 450439:450551

Project Member Reported by rsch...@chromium.org, Feb 21 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=694628

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDghIzAqwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-one
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background_social/background_social_facebook

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@450438      20090713 +- 1472197      21      good
chromium@450551      19910050 +- 1474543      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.social.facebook system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987028940371842720

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5290875707457536


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 27 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background_social/background_social_facebook

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@450438      19955691 +- 1588834      21      good
chromium@450551      20134501 +- 1543794      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.social.facebook system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986484177407703248

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5772109504053248


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 27 2017

Mergedinto: 692932
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : csharrison
  Commit : bd80f2b1e755bce061294a2ecb8a28b988c9a30a
  Date   : Tue Feb 14 16:47:00 2017
  Subject: [LazyParseCSS] Add field trial configs for testing

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_media/load_media_youtube
  Change       : 2.12% | 39698434.6667 -> 40541641.7778

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@450284      39698435 +- 1825656      9      good
chromium@450351      39409155 +- 1230155      6      good
chromium@450368      39832579 +- 441052       6      good
chromium@450377      39652013 +- 1326975      6      good
chromium@450379      39925990 +- 658086       9      good
chromium@450380      40024977 +- 865315       9      good
chromium@450381      40550972 +- 680954       9      bad       <--
chromium@450385      40496643 +- 516424       6      bad
chromium@450418      40453236 +- 447620       9      bad
chromium@450552      40541642 +- 694531       9      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.youtube system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986484172224676960

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5906873162661888


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Labels: Performance-Memory
Labels: -Performance-Memory

Sign in to add a comment