New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 694456 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 694544



Sign in to add a comment

116% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 451206:451255

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Feb 21 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, Feb 21 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=694456

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDguPf0pwsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-webview-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/browse_media/browse_media_facebook_photos

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@451205      9.87186 +- 8.31286      21      good
chromium@451255      9.60729 +- 8.45612      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.facebook.photos v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987055856494855664

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5774482582536192


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by u...@chromium.org, Feb 21 2017

Blockedon: 694544

Comment 5 by u...@chromium.org, Feb 21 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Graphs restored, could be temporary issue on the bot.

Sign in to add a comment