New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 693540 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.3% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 448609:448634

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Feb 17 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=693540

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg-MD7qAsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus7v2
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 17 2017

Mergedinto: 690413
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : jgruber
  Commit : 7d15175a0f59dfc15cf811a45e358dd4cc9b36e9
  Date   : Tue Feb 07 10:07:57 2017
  Subject: Revert of [regexp] Add stub for RegExpExec instead of inlining (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2677073004/ )

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
  Change       : 2.15% | 3341981.33333 -> 3413783.33333

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@448608                    3341981 +- 1323.22      6      good
chromium@448615                    3342227 +- 335.269      6      good
chromium@448618                    3342233 +- 345.319      6      good
chromium@448619                    3341991 +- 1060.54      6      good
chromium@448619,v8@f4739ea863      3342292 +- 79.599       6      good
chromium@448619,v8@7d15175a0f      3414008 +- 1063.77      6      bad       <--
chromium@448619,v8@009e8b11e2      3413801 +- 36.5148      6      bad
chromium@448620                    3409891 +- 21334.2      6      bad
chromium@448621                    3413789 +- 54.0864      6      bad
chromium@448634                    3413783 +- 43.9697      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987406712652422000

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6124121777242112


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment