Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.9% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi at 450492:450544 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987407026884649328
,
Feb 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___us.24h.com.vn_ Revision Result N chromium@450491 594.348 +- 78.7137 21 good chromium@450544 600.708 +- 106.442 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...us.24h.com.vn. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987407026884649328 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6099139965747200 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Feb 17 2017
The metric looks like it's recovering.
,
Mar 14 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Feb 17 2017