New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 693475 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
yosin@chromium.org
Closed: Mar 2017
Cc:
yosin@chromium.org
█ alexclarke@chromium.org
editing-dev@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.3% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases at 450370:450463

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Feb 17 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Feb 17 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=693475

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg2PvcsQsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 17 2017

Cc: yosin@chromium.org
Owner: yosin@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author yosin@chromium.org ===

Hi yosin@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : yosin
  Commit : d892f9592860691ae9a782c12260c94ed6bd1a63
  Date   : Tue Feb 14 15:56:00 2017
  Subject: Make FrameSelection to hold non-canonicalized DOM positions

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times
  Change       : 2.63% | 28.9877673114 -> 29.7513905384

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@450369      28.9878 +- 0.1628         6      good
chromium@450370      29.8997 +- 0.444263       6      bad       <--
chromium@450371      29.7806 +- 0.229984       6      bad
chromium@450372      29.8085 +- 0.0915779      6      bad
chromium@450375      29.8634 +- 0.2993         6      bad
chromium@450381      29.7877 +- 0.45169        6      bad
chromium@450393      29.8412 +- 0.231421       6      bad
chromium@450416      29.8104 +- 0.498504       6      bad
chromium@450463      29.7514 +- 0.367777       6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987419800090562640

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5227350725230592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by yosin@chromium.org, Feb 17 2017

Components: -Internals>GPU Blink>Editing>Selection
Labels: -Performance-Sheriff Performance
Status: Started (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 17 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987393631348168016

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5296754175508480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 7 by yosin@chromium.org, Feb 18 2017 

http://crrev.com/451270 (for speedommeter) doesn't recover...
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 18 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@451272      29.0856 +- 0.621984      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987323236123874448

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6094256453713920


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 21 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987088770746538352

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6178679270408192


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 12 by yosin@chromium.org, Mar 2 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Started)
It seems current graph is recovered.
Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@451265      29.1314 +- 0.827235      21      good
chromium@451275      29.0867 +- 0.631944      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624191288320080

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5296754175508480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
►

Sign in to add a comment