New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 693005 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Windows , Mac
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Unable to stop profiler recording in dedicated devtools on chrome://inspect page.

Reported by yfulgaon...@etouch.net, Feb 16 2017

Issue description

Chrome Version : 58.0.3013.3 (Official Build) f3229ac11997e2b5fe740be8738c2ac80ab9f4c3-refs/branch-heads/3013@{#6} 32/64 bit
OS : Windows (7,8,10), Mac(10.11.6, 10.12.1, 10.12), Linux(14.04 LTS)

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Launch chrome, navigate to chrome://inspect and click on "Open dedicated DevTools for Node" (Devtools window appears).
2. In devtools window, navigate to 'Profiler' tab and click on 'Start' button. (Recording starts)
3. Now click on 'Stop' button and observe.

Actual : Unable to stop recording under 'Profiler' tab.
Expected : User should be able to stop the recording.

This is a non-regression issue, seen from M-57 series as this is a new feature introduced in build #57.0.2987.0.
 
Actual_devtools.mp4
817 KB View Download
Status: Untriaged (was: Unconfirmed)
Changing the status to Untriaged, so that the issue would get addressed.
Thank You.

Comment 2 by l...@chromium.org, Feb 17 2017

Owner: eostroukhov@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Seems that we should be able to stop or disable the Profiler when there isn't any node target available.

eostroukhov@, could you please take a look?
Is your application waiting for IO (e.g. waiting for a socket connection, timer, etc)? In this case it might be this bug: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11589

Can you provide more details? Do you start with "--debug-brk" (or --inspect-brk)? Are you running Node script to completion?
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Closing as not enough information was provided (see comment #3). Suspected issue on the Node side was fixed.

Sign in to add a comment