New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 692969 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

58.3% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 448673:448800

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Feb 16 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=692969

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg2MnGswsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.canvas
  Metric       : draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d/draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@448672      1227.51 +- 1210.07      21      good
chromium@448800      1161.49 +- 1145.48      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987514407902760784

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5054898527272960


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
The graph looks strongly bi-modal.  I don't believe this is a real regression.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.canvas
  Metric       : draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d/draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@448672      822.874 +- 693.447      21      good
chromium@448800      915.175 +- 1759.42      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982652062405442208

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5054898527272960


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment