Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-2.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 448308:448439 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987514448314375744
,
Feb 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:java_heap:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_washingtonpost Revision Result N chromium@448307 66510512 +- 180587 21 good chromium@448405 66519292 +- 129182 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.washingtonpost system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987514448314375744 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5532195894067200 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Feb 16 2017
The ref moved at the same time, we can ignore this.
,
Mar 11 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982612039163235360 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Feb 16 2017