Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.4%-32.8% regression in blink_perf.layout at 449921:449978 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987514673426507968
,
Feb 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : fdoray Commit : b83be4ca0e00b50b17619adf7f7de275455e9852 Date : Mon Feb 13 16:39:47 2017 Subject: Use TaskScheduler instead of WorkerPool in v8_platform.cc. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : character_fallback_aat/character_fallback_aat Change : 32.02% | 0.0676666666667 -> 0.0893333333333 Revision Result N chromium@449930 0.0676667 +- 0.00439697 6 good chromium@449954 0.0671667 +- 0.00477842 6 good chromium@449966 0.0668333 +- 0.00498331 6 good chromium@449972 0.0695 +- 0.00758288 6 good chromium@449975 0.0693333 +- 0.0122202 6 good chromium@449976 0.0868333 +- 0.0115253 6 bad <-- chromium@449977 0.0911667 +- 0.0105277 6 bad chromium@449978 0.0893333 +- 0.0092376 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987514673426507968 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4963690601775104 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Feb 16 2017