New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 692237 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Android
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Don't consider a page a candidate for a WebAPK if the Web Manifest's scope is not within service worker scope

Project Member Reported by pkotw...@chromium.org, Feb 14 2017

Issue description

Don't consider a page a candidate for a WebAPK if the Web Manifest's scope is not within service worker scope

 
Owner: zpeng@chromium.org
Status: Assigned
Felix can you please take a look?
Cc: dominickn@chromium.org pkotw...@chromium.org

Comment 3 by sbirch@chromium.org, Feb 14 2017

Cc: slightlyoff@chromium.org owe...@chromium.org
I would hold off on implementation pending some investigation into sites with disjoint ServiceWorkers. That seems legitimate and this would prevent them from getting a WebAPK.

Meta: I also think we should strive to keep the criteria for the banner prompt, WebAPKability, and the Lighthouse section "User can be prompted to Add to Homescreen" in sync.

+Owen, who should we coordinate with on lighthouse?

Comment 4 by zpeng@chromium.org, Mar 6 2017

Cc: -dominickn@chromium.org zpeng@chromium.org
Owner: ----
Status: Available (was: Assigned)
Status: WontFix (was: Available)
This is an older bug (predates a lot of the discussion on what constitutes an app). Given that this isn't covered on PWAList/Lighthouse, I don't think we want this. We can re-open if/when that changes

Sign in to add a comment