Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Lengthen history expiry period |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionHistory expiry can result in bad omnibox quality. If we can lengthen it, we should. Moving to flat containers for the omnibox might get enough perf win to let us expand this. It might be hard to measure the statistical benefits of this. I would expect the biggest benefit to be in users not getting occasional surprising behavior where something they expected to appear didn't. This wouldn't happen regularly enough to be very measurable. Personally, I would be OK with a change here that was stat-neutral.
,
Feb 15 2017
(See bug 692386 regarding the last paragraph of comment 1.)
,
Jun 26 2017
We're actually experimenting with decreasing the size of the history database, at least HQP's one. This so far is quality-neutral on omnibox measurements on dev. I think people (at least on Android) would appreciate the memory more than a different quality-neutral change in the other direction. Punting to re-assess next year when the shrinking omnibox history database experiments are finished.
,
Jul 19 2017
,
Dec 14 2017
"expiration" and "expires" are a useful keywords to have on this bug, both previously lacking.
,
Jan 9 2018
The NextAction date has arrived: 2018-01-09
,
Dec 17
This issue has been Available for over a year. If it's no longer important or seems unlikely to be fixed, please consider closing it out. If it is important, please re-triage the issue. Sorry for the inconvenience if the bug really should have been left as Available. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Dec 17
Still low-priority, as we don't commonly hear of cases where this will help.
,
Jan 8
The NextAction date has arrived: 2019-01-08 |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pkasting@chromium.org
, Feb 15 2017