Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7%-58.7% regression in media_perftests at 449730:449839 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987733791617285056
,
Feb 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : media_perftests Metric : vector_math_fmul/optimized_unaligned Revision Result N chromium@449769 787.109 +- 10.4348 21 good chromium@449839 788.157 +- 11.3211 21 bad To Run This Test .\src\out\Release\media_perftests.exe --single-process-tests Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987733791617285056 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6394069934145536 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 3 2017
The graph shows that this has recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jrumm...@chromium.org
, Feb 13 2017