Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
72.6% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 449410:449542 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThe metric seems to be recovering but I am creating this bug in case it does not.
,
Feb 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987755215349214768
,
Feb 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : japhet Commit : ffefd4173f178d76449fc51f5dc22bfd7e120e03 Date : Thu Feb 09 22:25:56 2017 Subject: Actually handle the Vary header in blink, rather than punting on sight. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest Change : 34.79% | 718.739952388 -> 968.763880911 Revision Result N chromium@449409 718.74 +- 176.83 14 good chromium@449426 700.183 +- 168.412 9 good chromium@449434 703.18 +- 199.109 9 good chromium@449436 642.182 +- 210.157 6 good chromium@449437 741.981 +- 165.463 6 good chromium@449438 1170.78 +- 296.079 6 bad <-- chromium@449443 1011.34 +- 469.389 6 bad chromium@449475 1025.36 +- 971.987 14 bad chromium@449542 968.764 +- 829.232 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987755215349214768 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4831375745613824 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by majidvp@google.com
, Feb 13 2017