New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 690220 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

5.2% regression in v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 at 448159:448178

Project Member Reported by briander...@chromium.org, Feb 8 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=690220

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqKOBsgkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11-pro

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_max

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@448158      73494047 +- 8212466       21      good
chromium@448178      72353689 +- 14425452      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988182561807491264

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6126706911346688


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_max

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@448157      73280717 +- 10440576      21      good
chromium@448184      73366139 +- 12013560      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988006469169913440

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6340297077817344


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by mustaq@chromium.org, Jul 10 2017

Most of these bugs re v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 should be handled through  Issue 724262  .

Comment 7 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 11 2017

Owner: u...@chromium.org

Comment 8 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: Fixed (was: Untriaged)
The graphs recovered.

Sign in to add a comment