Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Need a way to request CQ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionIn the webkit code review tool, you could mark a CL as requesting CQ, i.e., if the reviewer was entirely happy with your patch, they knew that it was OK to not only mark it as reviewed, but also dump it into the CQ. There should be a way to mark a CL as such in gerrit as well
,
Feb 8 2017
in the dogfooding email, we were asked to file issues in this component.
,
Feb 8 2017
Thanks for the info, I will take my objections to agable.
,
Feb 8 2017
As part of triage of PolyGerrit issues, we’ve just been moving them to the Chromium project in the case where it’s Chromium-specific. This has scaling issues as we onboard more people, so we’ll follow up off-bug.
,
Feb 8 2017
,
Feb 8 2017
,
Feb 13 2017
This is clearly afterglow, as it is a regression relative to the WebKit tool, not to Rietveld. Also, I think it might actually be a gerrit feature request (adding an "autosubmit" capability), but we'll come back to that after launch.
,
Jan 3 2018
Removing Milestone-Afterglow, as it has ceased to have meaning. More refined milestones may be added back in the near future.
,
Jan 5 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by dborowitz@google.com
, Feb 8 2017