acid3 test #35 failed
Reported by
extrom...@gmail.com,
Feb 8 2017
|
|||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/58.0.3004.3 Safari/537.36 Example URL: http://acid3.acidtests.org/ Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Visit acid3.acidtests.org 2. Only get 99 of 100 score What is the expected behavior? 1. Visit acid3.acidtests.org 2. Get 100 of 100 score What went wrong? From the log of acid3 test: Test 35 failed: expected '0' but got '1' - root element, with no parent node, claims to be a :first-child Does it occur on multiple sites: N/A Is it a problem with a plugin? No Did this work before? Yes 57.0.2987.19 Does this work in other browsers? Yes Chrome version: 58.0.3000.4 Channel: dev OS Version: Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 24.0 r0
,
Feb 9 2017
@extromium -- Thank you for the report. Able to reproduce the issue on Latest Dev# 58.0.3004.3 on Windows, Mac and Linux. This is a regression issue broken in M58. Below are the bisect details, Chrome Good Build -- 57.0.2987.40 (Revision: 444943) Chrome Bad Build -- 58.0.2988.0 (Revision: 445272) You are probably looking for a change made after 444955 (known good), but no later than 444956 (first known bad). CHANGELOG URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/8127a839bf18e618aaf7a8cad95440c6cd3f9f76..464e47a82e253d08a7c7236fcf5cb5ec5bf8660b Review URL -- https://codereview.chromium.org/2588643004 Adding the related Dev in Cc. @ecobos -- Could you please look into the issue, kindly re-assign if this is not related to your changes. Adding RB label as this is a recent Regression. Thank You.
,
Feb 9 2017
This was intentional as the acid3 test no longer matches the spec. Making sure the acid3 test is fixed was noted in the replies to the intent to ship. Emilio, did you report to acid3feedback@webstandards.org?
,
Feb 9 2017
That address bounces my mail back, so I followed up on an existing www-style thread instead. Will post a link when it reaches the archives.
,
Feb 9 2017
Well, the archive seems to have eaten my mail. Anyway, here it is the sent mail. I'll resend it if I don't get reply in a few days I guess. Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:50:11 +0100 From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <ecobos@igalia.com> To: www-style@w3.org, ian@hixie.ch Cc: ms2ger@gmail.com, acid3feedback@webstandards.org Subject: Re: Acid3 and :first-child Reply-To: CAP2znoberFeuey0U-KcMH+gtJXYJAPTL9wXkD9ygoj=o2DGyEQ@mail.gmail.com Hi, I would like to ask to get the test fixed too. Blink has implemented this behavior now, and it's clear that the test doesn't test any standard specification. For discussion about whether the spec change is right or wrong, please see this csswg-drafts issue[1] and the blink-dev thread[2]. Ian, any chance you would reconsider fixing this test? -- Emilio [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/695 [2]: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/RgdSWmv0s4g
,
Feb 15 2017
Just to update the latest bahaviour : still observed the issue on latest Canary#58.0.3012.0 on Windows 7,Mac 10.12.2 & Linux Ubuntu 14.04. ecobos@Could you please look into this issue & update the thread. Thank you.
,
Feb 15 2017
I never received that mail to www-style, and I could not find it in the lists archive.
,
Feb 15 2017
I bet it got filtered because of the bogus Reply-To header (which should've been In-Reply-To). Anyway, just re-sent it, and Cc'd you.
,
Feb 21 2017
ecobos@/rune@: Removing the blocker label as per C#2 as this is intentional as per the spec. Please revert if this should still be blocking. Thank you!
,
Feb 28 2017
Friendly ping!! ecobos@, Still we are able to reproduce the issue on latest Canary#58.0.3025.0 on Windows7,Mac 10.12.2 & Ubuntu-14.04.Please look into this issue & update the thread accordingly. Thank you.
,
Mar 3 2017
ecobos@ I still cannot see any mails in the www-style archive. I did get the mail, though.
,
Mar 3 2017
Seems like someone went through the pending messages and posted them today? https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0008.html
,
Mar 20 2017
Still able to reproduce the issue on Win-10 using latest canary #59.0.3046.0. ecobos@ - Friendly Ping...!! Could you please have a look into this issue. Thanks...!!
,
May 5 2017
Two new acid3 regression bugs: chromium bug #718708 - acid3 test #23 failed chromium bug #718709 - acid3 test #25 failed
,
Jul 19 2017
Issue 745257 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jul 31 2017
See: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/695 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2017Jul/0003.html |
|||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||
Comment 1 by ligim...@chromium.org
, Feb 8 2017