New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 689104 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

16.8% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 447233:447334

Project Member Reported by crouleau@chromium.org, Feb 6 2017

Issue description

regression on energy_consumption_mwh on win-zenbook

related bug crbug/685787
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=689104

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg6NDStgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/energy_consumption_mwh

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@447232      17.8472 +- 1.0031      21      good
chromium@447334      17.966 +- 1.12706      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988385224824219696

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5216907076042752


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/energy_consumption_mwh

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@447232      19.287 +- 1.41526       21      good
chromium@447334      19.4584 +- 2.50434      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651767518977648

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5216907076042752


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Components: Internals>Media
Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.

Sign in to add a comment