Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.9% regression in v8.browsing_mobile_ignition at 442253:442341 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Feb 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988419883452614656
,
Feb 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:code_and_metadata_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_twitter Revision Result N chromium@442252 1186685 +- 58462.2 21 good chromium@442341 1198323 +- 69487.3 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988419883452614656 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5332271374008320 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 24 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982619892932583984 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mythria@chromium.org
, Feb 6 2017