New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 688454 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

20.1% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 446170:446229

Project Member Reported by jasontiller@chromium.org, Feb 3 2017

Issue description

Looks like a land/revert pattern so just an FYI, but I didn't an obvious CL.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=688454

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqPzsoAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : percentage_smooth/http___techcrunch.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@446169      79.8024 +- 71.3246      21      good
chromium@446229      70.3166 +- 56.6102      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...techcrunch.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988654258993182000

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6138796640305152


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Mergedinto: 685179
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : wangxianzhu
  Commit : 82b28ef9b1758cfcd3234a0bc6385f95239d9c01
  Date   : Thu Jan 26 00:24:39 2017
  Subject: Remove partial paint property update handling

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : percentage_smooth/http___techcrunch.com
  Change       : 17.65% | 65.9432091396 -> 54.3031199402

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@446169      65.9432 +- 1.57595      6      good
chromium@446171      67.6653 +- 3.16783      6      good
chromium@446172      66.1045 +- 2.57904      6      good
chromium@446173      53.6324 +- 5.52628      6      bad       <--
chromium@446177      53.5752 +- 3.62339      6      bad
chromium@446184      52.7453 +- 4.11042      6      bad
chromium@446199      53.2026 +- 3.46255      6      bad
chromium@446229      54.3031 +- 3.64731      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...techcrunch.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988639248570477024

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5506881524596736


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment