New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 688135 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ jasontiller@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.7% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 446647:446677

Project Member Reported by jasontiller@chromium.org, Feb 2 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org, Feb 2 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=688135

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgyP7cuwkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@446646      16.8293 +- 0.793334       21      good
chromium@446677      16.8709 +- 0.0779857      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988733973701772704

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5896471028695040


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 3 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@446605      16.8731 +- 0.0347375      21      good
chromium@446677      16.8765 +- 0.0403866      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988725951119840800

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5807957456977920


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 3 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@446282      16.8781 +- 0.0507963      21      good
chromium@446921      16.8778 +- 0.0539224      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988652329918175712

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6492413310271488


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 4 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@446379      16.8735 +- 0.0300953      21      good
chromium@446677      16.8774 +- 0.0434951      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988639118262283424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4514145535262720


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 4 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@446379      16.8689 +- 0.18214        21      good
chromium@446677      16.8768 +- 0.0361046      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988639118262283424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4514145535262720


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 5 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@446646      15.9717 +- 1.61099       21      good
chromium@446677      16.0702 +- 0.304308      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988639118262283424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4514145535262720


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 12 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range

Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com
  Change       : 0.40% | 16.8567185395 -> 16.9245769496

Suspected Commit Range
  18 commits in range
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/946f89ab4dfffec7f9d13bac423ca5a0df949bb6..a77ff271cfd7bb0602db0d8965657c228c8f591a


Revision             Result                   N
chromium@446646      16.8567 +- 0.175552      14       good
chromium@446647      ---                      ---      build failure
---                  ---                      ---      too many build failures to list
chromium@446663      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@446664      16.875 +- 0.0219068      21       bad
chromium@446677      16.9246 +- 0.534828      14       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988639118262283424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4514145535262720


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@446646      16.8765 +- 0.0372956      21      good
chromium@446677      16.8776 +- 0.0426409      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987753151307621904

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5250062445182976


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 18 by benhenry@chromium.org, Mar 11 2017

Labels: Performance-Responsiveness
Project Member

Comment 20 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@446646      16.8712 +- 0.129697       21      good
chromium@446677      16.8751 +- 0.0476033      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982636253400612816

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5250062445182976


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 22 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment