New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 688134 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.8% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 446339:446471

Project Member Reported by jasontiller@chromium.org, Feb 2 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=688134

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgyIygqgkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___answers.yahoo.com

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@446338      16.4262 +- 0.786699      21      good
chromium@446471      16.4204 +- 0.83991       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...answers.yahoo.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988733987234963424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6357818497564672


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/686
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
There was a problem with the bisect_config dictionary passed to the recipe. See output of the config step.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___answers.yahoo.com

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@446338      16.4195 +- 0.637201      21      good
chromium@446471      16.4658 +- 0.765689      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...answers.yahoo.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988639559816739488

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6410450570313728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Labels: Performance-Responsiveness
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment