New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 688133 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Mar 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

47.8% regression in smoothness.image_decoding_cases at 447227:447303

Project Member Reported by jasontiller@chromium.org, Feb 2 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=688133

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgyJnvtQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.image_decoding_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@447226      16.6701 +- 0.0368167      21      good
chromium@447303      16.6753 +- 0.0396139      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.image_decoding_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988734140518227168

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5778643969638400


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.image_decoding_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@447226      16.9031 +- 0.623795      21      good
chromium@447478      16.8914 +- 0.745939      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.image_decoding_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988726000974702160

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5906954305667072


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.image_decoding_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@447226      16.6757 +- 0.0388151      21      good
chromium@447303      16.6748 +- 0.0388249      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.image_decoding_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988639575723814336

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5817800649605120


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 8 by ajuma@chromium.org, Mar 3 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Closing since the metric recovered and the bisect bots could not find any regression.
Labels: Performance-Responsiveness

Sign in to add a comment