Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
986.9%-1375.3% regression in media.tough_video_cases_extra at 447110:447196 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionMassive regression in seek time. Check out the graphs.
,
Feb 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988820507877449456
,
Feb 2 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.tough_video_cases_extra Metric : seek/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio Revision Result N chromium@447145 0.96881 +- 0.144725 21 good chromium@447195 3.98238 +- 29.6458 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogg.type.audio media.tough_video_cases_extra Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988820507877449456 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5807187852525568 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 2 2017
+simonhatch@, I am considering manually running this bisect because the tool is not working. Is there anything else I can do before I take on that task?
,
Feb 2 2017
re: #c4 Unfortunately the test we use at the moment isn't great with this kind of data, where most of the values are nearly identical save for a few outliers. We're working on improving this but that won't be ready for a while. +dtu Dave can you think of anything that might help here in the short term?
,
Feb 3 2017
It recovered again.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982576269446140640 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by crouleau@chromium.org
, Feb 1 2017