Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
PaymentRequestExpiredLocalCardTest#testPromptErrorMessages failing on Android Tests and linux_android_rel_ng |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionchrome_public_test_apk failing on chromium.linux/Android Tests (dbg) Builders failed on: - Android Tests (dbg): https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.linux/builders/Android%20Tests%20%28dbg%29 The test is failing at line 158 [1], which is inside a block which doesn't get run in January. UTC ticked over from January to February about two hours ago, when this test started failing. I'll follow-up with a test disable CL. Assigning to sebsg@, who appears to own the test.
,
Feb 1 2017
Disable going through CQ now: https://codereview.chromium.org/2666253002/
,
Feb 1 2017
,
Jun 12 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/105ac643a506f1a5cf822d0ebca27e718c46a892 commit 105ac643a506f1a5cf822d0ebca27e718c46a892 Author: Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@chromium.org> Date: Mon Jun 12 18:17:34 2017 CVC unmask dialog usability improvement. Before this patch, hitting the software keyboard's "submit" button in the CVC unmask dialog would hide the software keyboard and recenter the dialog vertically. This would cause the user to hunt for the "Confirm" button on the dialog at a new location. The user would be even more frustrated if they instead accidentally tapped outside of the CVC dialog, which cancels the CVC unmask. This patch adds an editor action listener for the CVC number field in the CVC unmask dialog. Whenever the user hits "submit" button on their software keyboard in the CVC dialog, the listener checks if the dialog's "confirm" button is enabled and, if so, clicks it. This patch also changes the default software keyboard action on expiration date from "submit" to "next field". After this patch, hitting the software keyboard's "submit" button in the CVC unmask dialog will perform the CVC unmask. Bug: 730771 , 687438 Change-Id: Ie8d93e1df214c7fd5494dd0da64a3b94fb1861b9 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/527500 Reviewed-by: David Trainor <dtrainor@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ganggui Tang <gogerald@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#478685} [modify] https://crrev.com/105ac643a506f1a5cf822d0ebca27e718c46a892/chrome/android/java/res/layout/autofill_card_unmask_prompt.xml [modify] https://crrev.com/105ac643a506f1a5cf822d0ebca27e718c46a892/chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/autofill/CardUnmaskPrompt.java [modify] https://crrev.com/105ac643a506f1a5cf822d0ebca27e718c46a892/chrome/android/javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/payments/PaymentRequestExpiredLocalCardTest.java [modify] https://crrev.com/105ac643a506f1a5cf822d0ebca27e718c46a892/chrome/android/javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/payments/PaymentRequestTestCommon.java [modify] https://crrev.com/105ac643a506f1a5cf822d0ebca27e718c46a892/chrome/android/javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/payments/PaymentRequestTestRule.java
,
Jan 24 2018
,
Jan 24 2018
,
Feb 1 2018
Upgrading to P0. This test is failing on all tryjobs on linux_android_rel_ng right now: https://ci.chromium.org/buildbot/tryserver.chromium.android/linux_android_rel_ng/ and any change that modifies the build can't get through the CQ. The disabling of this test apparently never succeeded. CC'ing sheriffs. Could someone please take care of this? This is another reason that retries need to be disabled. Also has FindIt found when this started regressing?
,
Feb 1 2018
Looking into this...
,
Feb 1 2018
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/e6e5740dcac30d7c8bce859477552a1997c4f1de commit e6e5740dcac30d7c8bce859477552a1997c4f1de Author: Balazs Engedy <engedy@chromium.org> Date: Thu Feb 01 12:34:39 2018 Disable PaymentRequestExpiredLocalCardTest#testPromptErrorMessages. The test has been consistently failing on try bots since the beginning of February. TBR=tsergeant@chromium.org Bug: 687438 Change-Id: Ifc4a68d1d642777365f191c6fc5b64d153989b10 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/897496 Commit-Queue: Balazs Engedy <engedy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Balazs Engedy <engedy@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#533644} [modify] https://crrev.com/e6e5740dcac30d7c8bce859477552a1997c4f1de/chrome/android/javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/payments/PaymentRequestExpiredLocalCardTest.java
,
Feb 1 2018
Rouslan, you touched the test last, could you please look into what's going wrong with it and re-enable?
,
Feb 1 2018
,
Feb 1 2018
Re #7: no, Findit didn't analyze this test failure. Because those Android builders/testers seem moved from chromium.linux to chromium.android, they are not on the support whitelist anymore. File https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=808053 to add them back.
,
Feb 1 2018
The test in question runs different code depending on whether it's January. This has broken before and usually is an easy fix. Looking into it now.
,
Feb 1 2018
Issue 808042 has been merged into this issue.
,
Feb 1 2018
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/7a39316477f43dbdee1cb8f2ff21fc9b33415032 commit 7a39316477f43dbdee1cb8f2ff21fc9b33415032 Author: Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@chromium.org> Date: Thu Feb 01 19:09:05 2018 [Payments] Fix integration test for expired card. Bug: 687438 Change-Id: If141c86a47e5455c94a3ed36b1d6d5bc95033d9f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/897887 Commit-Queue: Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sebastien Seguin-Gagnon <sebsg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Seguin-Gagnon <sebsg@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#533762} [modify] https://crrev.com/7a39316477f43dbdee1cb8f2ff21fc9b33415032/chrome/android/javatests/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/payments/PaymentRequestExpiredLocalCardTest.java
,
Feb 1 2018
,
Feb 5 2018
Issue 808606 has been merged into this issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tsergeant@chromium.org
, Feb 1 2017