Project: chromium Issues People Development process History Sign in
New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.
Starred by 1 user
Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Mar 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 3
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment
lakitu-gpu-incremental build has not passed for a while
Project Member Reported by uekawa@chromium.org, Feb 1 2017 Back to list
Cc: pprabhu@chromium.org edjee@google.com
was added in
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/425455/
and never passed since ? 

Comment 2 by ameyd@google.com, Feb 1 2017
edjee@ is the one who added it so he probably has the most context.
Owner: edjee@google.com
Comment 4 by edjee@google.com, Feb 1 2017
Status: Started
Thanks. I'm looking into it.
Project Member Comment 5 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Feb 2 2017
The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/autotest/+/8beb03fe8553c30942ef7869b169d97798fed2f9

commit 8beb03fe8553c30942ef7869b169d97798fed2f9
Author: Edward Hyunkoo Jee <edjee@google.com>
Date: Thu Feb 02 20:29:30 2017

security_SandboxedServices: Add baseline for lakitu-gpu

BUG=b:31042842
BUG= chromium:687437 

TEST=security_SandboxedServices passes for lakitu-gpu

Change-Id: I8d1978e8c8740cb47257a88bff41ed74dd680527
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/435469
Commit-Ready: Edward Jee <edjee@google.com>
Tested-by: Edward Jee <edjee@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@chromium.org>

[add] https://crrev.com/8beb03fe8553c30942ef7869b169d97798fed2f9/client/site_tests/security_SandboxedServices/baseline.lakitu-gpu

Comment 6 by edjee@google.com, Feb 6 2017
Now security_SandboxedServices, which used to always fail, passes. And, as a result, most of the lakitu-gpu-incremental builds are green.

However, another test, cloud_CloudInit, is flaky. And that causes occasional failure. Still looking into it.
Comment 7 by edjee@google.com, Feb 7 2017
security_SshAuth also looks flaky.
Comment 8 by edjee@google.com, Mar 3 2017
Status: Fixed
These days the tests look ok. As of now (14:50, Mar 3, 2017 PST) I don't see any meaningful difference between lakitu-gpu-incremental[1] and lakitu-incremental[2].

So closing the bug.


[1] https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/lakitu-gpu-incremental?numbuilds=300
[2] https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/lakitu-incremental?numbuilds=300
Sign in to add a comment