was added in
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/425455/
and never passed since ? 

edjee@ is the one who added it so he probably has the most context.

Thanks. I'm looking into it.

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/autotest/+/8beb03fe8553c30942ef7869b169d97798fed2f9

commit 8beb03fe8553c30942ef7869b169d97798fed2f9
Author: Edward Hyunkoo Jee <edjee@google.com>
Date: Thu Feb 02 20:29:30 2017

security_SandboxedServices: Add baseline for lakitu-gpu

BUG=b:31042842
BUG= chromium:687437 

TEST=security_SandboxedServices passes for lakitu-gpu

Change-Id: I8d1978e8c8740cb47257a88bff41ed74dd680527
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/435469
Commit-Ready: Edward Jee <edjee@google.com>
Tested-by: Edward Jee <edjee@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@chromium.org>

[add] https://crrev.com/8beb03fe8553c30942ef7869b169d97798fed2f9/client/site_tests/security_SandboxedServices/baseline.lakitu-gpu

Now security_SandboxedServices, which used to always fail, passes. And, as a result, most of the lakitu-gpu-incremental builds are green.

However, another test, cloud_CloudInit, is flaky. And that causes occasional failure. Still looking into it.

security_SshAuth also looks flaky.

These days the tests look ok. As of now (14:50, Mar 3, 2017 PST) I don't see any meaningful difference between lakitu-gpu-incremental[1] and lakitu-incremental[2].

So closing the bug.


[1] https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/lakitu-gpu-incremental?numbuilds=300
[2] https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/lakitu-incremental?numbuilds=300